Skip to content

Future Thinking: Will Current Technology Eclipse Science Fiction?

12
Share

Future Thinking: Will Current Technology Eclipse Science Fiction?

Home / Future Thinking: Will Current Technology Eclipse Science Fiction?
Featured Essays technology

Future Thinking: Will Current Technology Eclipse Science Fiction?

By

Published on June 11, 2013

12
Share

Perhaps sparked by recent news of 3D photocopiers and the like, I’ve been thinking about SF and new technologies. One of the things you often hear people say these days is that science fiction is in danger of being overtaken by the sheer pace of advancements in science and technology. People were saying similar things, too, when I wrote my Shoal trilogy. It’s an understandable refrain, particularly when the news is now filled with reports about downloadable blueprints for building guns with those same 3D printers. The feeling that you’re living in a world co-scripted by John Varley and John Brunner tends to grow when you take a quick scan through any number of online news sites and discover front-page features on exoplanets, life extension, and NASA research into Alcubierre drives. It might seem that in the face of such remarkable advances, science fiction might no longer be as relevant as it once was, reality having in many respects caught up with it. You might think that, but you would be wrong.

Gary Gibson Final DaysWhen I wrote my more recent sixth novel, Final Days (set primarily in the 23rd Century), I had people using contact lenses with integrated circuitry that allowed you to do all kinds of fancy things. But even while I was writing that book, I knew such technologies were going to be around a great deal sooner than two hundred years from now. I figured something like those lenses would hit the shops by the 2030s at the earliest, or maybe a little later. Boy, was I wrong. They’re already here, in beta form at least, and they’re called Google Glasses. How, then, to write about the future, when the present has this irritating habit of catching up with you almost before you’ve finished writing?

It’s worth remembering, however, that so long as science fiction has existed, it has found itself in a world dominated by constant technological and scientific flux. That feeling, for many writers of speculative fiction, of the carpet constantly slipping from underneath their feet is, in fact, nothing new. It was as present on the day the first issue of Astounding, printed on cheap pulp paper, rolled off the presses way back in the 1920s as it is now.

Remember that science fiction is both an epiphenomenon and a response to the accelerating rate of technological advancement. When Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein, the scientific revolution of the Enlightenment had already taken steps towards radically revising our understanding of how the universe works. Her most famous novel was partly inspired by experiments in which dead tissue appeared to be reanimated—to be galvanised—into unholy life by the application of an electric current. It’s rightly known as the first science fiction novel because it’s a response to both the threat and the promise of such experiments.

Let’s jump forward, now, to almost of a century after the writing of that novel. We’re in the early decades of the 20th Century. If you’d asked the people reading the early SF magazines of the time—such as Astounding—what kind of world they lived in, they might well have said it was one with strongly science-fictional elements. It may have been a world lacking either jetpacks or working rocket ships, but within a short span of time it had seen the arrival of heavier-than-air flying machines, telephone communications systems spanning the globe, enormous ironclad killing machines roaming the world’s battlefields, and cinema screens that carried entertainment and propaganda in equal measure into the minds of millions. The skylines of cities in America and all around the globe were already being transformed into skyscraper-dominated canyons.

Most of those early SF fans were born about the same time that both radio and the first flying machines had come screaming into most people’s awareness with all the thudding impact, one must imagine, of a Martian war machine crashing into the English countryside. Had those early fans, then, worried that reality might be outpacing science fiction? If they did, history proved them wrong, and the genre only grew from strength to strength with the passing of the years.

But here’s a funny thing. Even such initially remarkable-seeming technologies eventually fade into the background. One day they’re just there—an invisible part of the everyday, humdrum world we share. When I sit on an international flight, I’m not thinking about how the jumbo jet represents a fantastical vision for the people of a century ago. I’m thinking about the inflight menu, and whether I want to finish the novel I’m reading.

That’s at least partly because giant flying machines have always been present in my life, but the same can’t be said of the internet. I was alive long before it became an intrinsic part of my daily life, and yet I cannot remember what the hell I did to pass the time before it arrived. I know that when I was a student, or when I was unemployed, and in my teens before that, I must have done something to pass the time. I definitely read books, and taught myself to play guitar, or hung out with friends (when I could find them at any rate—how the hell did I do that without a mobile phone?). Now an internet connection seems as intrinsic and necessary part of my life as electric lighting and running water. Did something so science fictional prove a threat to the continued survival of a genre that had largely, if not entirely, failed to predict its arrival?

Well, of course it didn’t. What happened instead was that our shared definition of what we mean by “futuristic” or “science fictional” got up and shifted its goal posts to accommodate the new reality, same as it ever has. It’s not harder to write SF in a fast-changing world. In some ways, it’s actually easier. New scientific developments, new theories, and new or nascent technologies help generate newer, fresher ideas that lead to new storytelling opportunities. Science fiction is not endangered by change; it is a necessary part of that change, our public and vocal response to technology and what it means for the way we live our lives. Fiction is, at heart, about people. And that means science fiction is by definition about the ways in which people’s lives are changed by science and our expanded understanding of how the universe works, regardless of whether or not the science or technology within those stories are invented.

A case in point: I believe that Google Glasses—or rather, the more streamlined and less visible technologies that will soon supersede them—will, along with 3D printing, bring about a major societal ground shift in the next couple of decades. The story telling opportunities within such technologies are boundless. What could be more exciting than trying to figure out what the world will look like once such technologies become commonplace? Yes, there are some who might choose to regard such changes with trepidation, but I prefer to look forward with anticipation. Even the core image of SF, that of men in space suits exploring other worlds, is gaining new life with the constant flood of exoplanet discoveries. How could we, as human beings, not imagine what it would be like to go out there and see those worlds with our own eyes? Imagination, after all, is not limited by the speed of light.

Here’s one thing I can tell you for certain. One of these days, when you and I are old and grey, we will look around our kitchens at our desktop 3D printer, while a traffic report floats magically before our eyes as if suspended in the air, and realise we can’t remember what it was like before these things came into our lives. And when that day comes, there will undoubtedly be new inventions and discoveries in the world we can’t yet imagine, but will nonetheless change the world as fundamentally and completely as the internet has. And, I guarantee you, we will be writing stories about them.


Gary Gibson’s Shoal trilogy consists of Stealing Light, Nova War and Empire of Light and all are reissued this month. Then next month, we reissue his stand-alones Angel Stations and Against Gravity. The month after, is his outstanding standalone Marauder, set in the same universe as his Shoal books, but much further into the future. Enjoy! And you can see more posts on and by Gary on our site here.

About the Author

Gary Gibson

Author

Gary Gibson’s Shoal trilogy consists of Stealing Light, Nova War and Empire of Light and all are reissued this month. Then next month, we reissue his stand-alones Angel Stations and Against Gravity. The month after, is his outstanding standalone Marauder, set in the same universe as his Shoal books, but much further into the future. Enjoy! And you can see more posts on and by Gary on our site here.
Learn More About Gary
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
11 years ago

I do remember what I did before mobile phones. Planning and waiting.

Payphones still existed and home phones often had someone there if not the person you were looking for. Answering machines helped a bit.

You left a message about where you were planning to go or what you wanted to do and then you went and did it. Friends either showed up or did not. No one worried too much about it.

People knew their friends phone numnbers as well as their own. They believed in circumstance and serendipity and fate. If it happened, it happened. Oddly enough it almost always happened.

It is true that technology does move the future faster and in different directions than most people can predict or expect.

It was a very interesting article.

Avatar
OgreMkV
11 years ago

And yet 2001 and 2010 have come and gone and we haven’t gotten past LEO.

Oh, the technology is probably there, but it’s not being used.

Avatar
11 years ago

Thanks for this, made me think :)

And ah yes, nostalgia – what did I ever do before the internet? (I remember these blocky things called books I used to spend a lot of time with…but other than that? Drawing a blank!)

~lakesidey

Avatar
11 years ago

Those are crazy things to think about really. I remember when cell phones were rare and pay phones everywhere. It will be so interesting to see where we are with technology by the time I’m old and decrepit!

Avatar
Jonellin Stonebreaker
11 years ago

We are simultaneously living in the 19th, 20th, & 21st centuries.
I am currently writing this post on my iPad streaming over a wireless connection with bandwidth that even a decade ago would have been fast for a wired connection, wearing horn rim glasses whose form would have been familiar to Isaac Asimov and resting on a three year old desk that would have been familiar to Jules Verne

Avatar
11 years ago

But even while I was writing that book, I knew such technologies were going to be around a great deal sooner than two hundred years from now.

From the wikipedia article on Joymakers, a device from Fred Pohl’s The Year of the Pussyfoot:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joymaker

Pohl himself, in an afterword to the novel, made the following statement about the world he foresaw:
“I do not really think it will be that long. Not five centuries. Perhaps not even five decades.” Forty years after the publication of the novel, most people of 2005 will recognise the functions of the Joymaker in the cellphone, laptop computer, and personal digital assistant. Only the medical capabilities are missing from devices carried by people in industrialized nations in the early 21st century. These devices, however usually have far more computing power than the Joymaker as conceived, and more even than the 1960s mainframe computers that provided the inspiration. Some of the actual social effects of portable communication and computing parallel those predicted in the novel.

Avatar
TheAdlerian
11 years ago

I am not impressed.

Most technology we have today are just different or better versions of what already existed. A cellphone is a phone and google glasses are a camera.

I had little desire to use either years ago and I have the same level of motivation today.

Avatar
a1ay
11 years ago

Most technology we have today are just different or better versions of
what already existed. A cellphone is a phone and google glasses are a
camera.

And email’s really just a telegram to your desktop, and a telegram’s just a faster version of the Royal Mail, and that’s really only a reorganised version of the old Roman post-horse courier system. And a jumbo jet doesn’t do much that you couldn’t do already by steamship and railway. And, come to that, a railway’s just a stagecoach but a bit faster and with a nicer ride quality. And really a steamship’s just an upgrade of a galley or a junk or a prau or a double-outrigger canoe.

Avatar
steved
11 years ago

Science Fiction literature can never be outpaced by technology because the literature is not just about technology – it is about how that technology affects people, socities and cultures; take an excellent SF novel by Disch as just one example: Camp Concentration does not posit any technology in advance of its era beyond an intelligence (actually a creativity) enhancing drug (something we are seeing mild versions of now), engages directly with that technology by demonstrating how it is used by its society, how it is used by those forced to take it and how it affects both. Whether or not such technology exists does not affect the import of the tale.
Those bemoaning the death of SF are failing to take account of the Campbellian revolution – the shift from the wonders of technology to what people do ‘with’ the technology.
Since you mentioned Astounding and the early years, I’ll also point out that the magazines and nascent fandom of the era saw science fiction as a tool for the advancement of science. Its (Gernsbackian) purpose was to envision new technologies as a way to encourage their development; stories were also meant to excite the interests of the common man in the sciences, to create a higher degree of understanding and involvement on the part of laymen.

Avatar
11 years ago

There’s no faster than light travel, no jetpacks, no flying cars, no lightsabers and no time travel. Reality still has much catching up to do with science fiction.

Avatar
11 years ago

The 3 d copier seems to be the closest thing we have to the Star Trek Replicators.

Avatar
11 years ago

If one wants to get a sense of how Science Fistion elements can become ‘just there’ watch the first and last seasons of “Law & Order” back to back. All the various day-to-day advances of that twenty year period [1990-2010] will jump out at you.